Logic and Reason

What is logic

The Power of Forgiveness

Logic is a branch of philosophy concerned with correct reasoning and the process of drawing conclusions from information. It provides a structured method for gaining knowledge about the world and making sense of our experiences. One of the earliest contributors to logical reasoning was Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher whose methods laid the foundation for later developments in logic. Although his approach was limited compared to modern standards, it marked an important beginning for the field.

Socrates is best known for the Socratic method, which is based on asking a series of questions to challenge assumptions and encourage deeper thinking. This method is still used today in education, law, and philosophical discussion. However, logic has evolved significantly over the past 2,500 years, becoming more formalized and complex. While the Socratic method remains useful, it does not encompass all forms of reasoning used in modern logic.

Because the Socratic method has limitations, it is helpful to examine other types of reasoning, particularly deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is based on premises and a conclusion. Premises are statements assumed to be true, and if the reasoning is valid, the conclusion necessarily follows from those premises. Determining whether premises are actually true can be challenging, which is why deductive arguments must be carefully evaluated.

The simplest deductive arguments consist of two premises and a conclusion. The conclusion must logically follow from the premises. For example, consider the question of whether Socrates actually existed. One premise is that several of Socrates’ students and contemporaries wrote detailed accounts of his life and teachings. Another premise is that historical records describe his trial, conviction, and execution. From these premises, it logically follows that Socrates was a real historical person.

Although it is theoretically possible that the premises are false, no stronger explanation accounts for the available historical evidence. Because the premises are well supported and the conclusion follows logically from them, the argument is both valid and sound. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion follows logically from the premises, and a sound argument is a valid argument with true premises.

Site Content

Inductive arguments are what science is based on.

This diagram compares a deductive argument form with an inductive

Inductive arguments—the backbone of science—operate differently from deductive ones. Rather than being judged as valid or invalid, the premises of an inductive argument are evaluated as strong or weak. These premises begin with specific observations and move toward broader generalizations. When the premises provide strong support and the reasoning is clear, the conclusion is considered cogent; when the support is weak or incomplete, the conclusion becomes uncogent. Even in the best cases, however, inductive conclusions never offer absolute certainty—they provide probability, not proof.

This distinction is essential for understanding scientific reasoning. Science relies almost entirely on inductive logic. Scientists gather evidence, identify patterns, develop hypotheses, and construct theories that best explain the available data. The more evidence that supports a theory, the more confidence we have in it—but this confidence never reaches 100 percent certainty. Scientific conclusions are always open to revision as new data emerges. In this way, inductive argumentation forms the backbone of the scientific method.

Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson famously stated, “The nice thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it.” DeGrasse Tyson is brilliant, but he knows better. Science does not prove things in the absolute sense. Instead, it builds models supported by the best available evidence. These models can be extremely reliable, yet they remain open to refinement or replacement.

One of the most significant scientific models in my lifetime is the Big Bang model. Decades of observations—from cosmic microwave background radiation to galactic redshifts—strongly support it, and recent data from the James Webb Space Telescope has added further evidence. Even so, scientists do not claim that the Big Bang model is unquestionably or permanently true. They claim it is the best explanation currently available, and they continue to test it against new discoveries.

Human beings naturally desire absolute certainty, but outside of mathematics—which deals in proofs and logical necessity—such certainty is rare. Science does not provide unshakable truths; it provides the most reliable, evidence-based explanations available at a given time. Its strength lies not in claiming final answers, but in its willingness to revise them. Scientific knowledge advances not because it is unquestionable, but because it is always open to questioning.

Peter 3:15 . Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for t

What is logic

The Power of Forgiveness

Site Content

Inductive arguments are what science is based on.