Reasonable Faith Baltimore

Reasonable Faith BaltimoreReasonable Faith BaltimoreReasonable Faith Baltimore
  • Home
  • Logic and Reason
    • Why Christians Leave
    • Logic and Reason
    • Logical Fallacies
  • Gods Existence
    • Kalam
    • Leibniz
    • Teleological
    • Resurrection
  • suffering and evil
    • Suffering And Evil
    • Why Hitler?
  • Know God?
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Reincarnation
  • Gen Z and Apple Pie
  • More
    • Home
    • Logic and Reason
      • Why Christians Leave
      • Logic and Reason
      • Logical Fallacies
    • Gods Existence
      • Kalam
      • Leibniz
      • Teleological
      • Resurrection
    • suffering and evil
      • Suffering And Evil
      • Why Hitler?
    • Know God?
    • Blog
    • Contact
    • Reincarnation
    • Gen Z and Apple Pie

Reasonable Faith Baltimore

Reasonable Faith BaltimoreReasonable Faith BaltimoreReasonable Faith Baltimore
  • Home
  • Logic and Reason
    • Why Christians Leave
    • Logic and Reason
    • Logical Fallacies
  • Gods Existence
    • Kalam
    • Leibniz
    • Teleological
    • Resurrection
  • suffering and evil
    • Suffering And Evil
    • Why Hitler?
  • Know God?
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Reincarnation
  • Gen Z and Apple Pie

For Iron Man, who breaks steel with his bare hands


Coming Back From the Dead

That just doesn't happen.Does it?


The resurrection occurred a long time ago. There are no videos, photographs, or audio recordings, and the New Testament was not compiled until the late fourth century. When discussing miracles, critics often cite David Hume, who argued that extraordinary events require extraordinary evidence—and claim that such evidence does not exist.


You may hear this type of objection delivered quickly, confidently, and with an air of authority. Sometimes it comes from someone in an academic setting who holds power over you. This can make you feel unsure of how to respond. These concerns are the reason I am writing this page.


One common claim is that the Bible was not written until the third or fourth century. I will give a brief response here and more details later. While the New Testament canon was formally compiled in the late 300s, most of the individual books were written much earlier—within roughly 15 to 65 years of the resurrection. Later on this page, I will examine passages in 1 Corinthians that Paul learned within 2 to 5 years after the resurrection.  


When studying history, what matters most is not how long ago an event occurred, but how soon it was recorded. Shortly after the resurrection, the Apostle Paul traveled to Jerusalem to meet with Peter and James. This visit is described in Galatians 1:18, and scholars generally agree that it took place within 2 to 5 years after the resurrection. What Paul learned during that visit is reflected in the early creed he records in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.  


3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance[a]: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas,[b] and then to the Twelve. 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8 and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.


It is important to note that these verses were shared with Paul during his visit, and they are not Paul's writing style. There is a rhythm to the verses since most of the population could not read, but they could 

memorize, and this is easier to memorize. Therefore, these verses were most likely spread just after the resurrection. These verses were most likely spread just after the resurrection.


A favorite patron saint of atheism is David Hume who is mentioned frequently when talking about miracles. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding


He defines the word 


I also want to address David Hume’s argument against miracles briefly. Earlier on this website, I discussed logical fallacies, one of which is “begging the question,” or circular reasoning. Many philosophers argue that Hume’s critique falls into this category because he assumes in his conclusion what he presupposes in his premises—namely, that miracles cannot occur. Others note that when Hume formulated his argument, our understanding of natural laws was far less developed than it is today


Premise 1 o

.



What is The Best Explanation For the Resurrection?

The Bible is an historical document

Instead of following the rules of logic on this topic, we treat the Bible as a historical document and look for the best explanation for the most significant historical event in human history. Some professors may say you really can’t find the truth about anything in history, but if that is true, why study history at all? There are standard ways of determining what really happened, and we will review the resurrection using them.


First, I review eye witnesses and attestations to determine how strong the evidence is; then, I will mention 

different explanations given.



The resurrection occured over 2,000 years ago can that be trusted

In studying history, the time from the event to its recording is more significant than the time elapsed from the event to the present day. Within five years after the resurrection, the Apostle Paul traveled to Jerusalem to visit Peter and James. This visit is recorded in Galatians 1:18, and it is generally agreed that it occurred within 2 to 5 years after the resurrection. What Paul learned during the visit he recorded in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.

“For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me."


Note the rhythmic nature of the verses; it is not Paul’s writing style. Since only about 5% of the population could read, they memorized. This information was easily memorized by those who could not read and shared with others who could not read. It would have been spread orally before being shared with the Apostle Paul. Dating a 2,000-year-old event to within 2 to 5 years is incredible, but most biblical scholars agree with the timing.



Something Happened, And It Was A Big Deal

I don’t know about you, but if I heard of a man running around telling people he was God, I might start thinking the dude was on the wrong side of the crazy line. However, he gives only three choices: crazy, a liar, or the God he said he was. After reviewing the evidence and the difference he makes in my life, I accept him as God. 



ME X3 ET

MEX3 is an acronym for the ressurection

Scholars agree that Paul visited Peter and James (Jesus’ half-brother) when he learned the Apostles’ creed. The meeting recorded in Galatians 1: 18 occurred within five years of the resurrection. 

M Multiple and individual eyewitnesses. On several occasions, Jesus appeared to groups, including one group of over 500 people. In addition, Jesus met with several people, including the 11 disciples, James, his brother, and the apostle Paul.


E  Embarrassing accounts. People do not make up lies that are embarrassing to them. In that part of the world, and at that time, it was embarrassing that women were the brave ones to discover the empty tomb. If someone were making up a new religion, would they start with women finding the empty tomb? Of course not. Women’s testimony in a court of law was nearly useless in the culture of that time.


The guys were crying in their wine. I’m sure a guy could lose his “man card” over a story like this. 


E Early accounts. Eyewitness accounts are closer to an actual event and more accurate than later accounts. For example, nearly all scholars agree that the tomb was empty.

Jesus’s

Enemy attestation Bias is unlikely from a neutral or hostile source. Certainly, the apostle Paul was a hostile source. Before God appeared to Paul, he hated Christians and punished them. Per John 7:5, James, Jesus's half-brother, did not agree with what Jesus said until after the resurrection.

                                                                                

ET is an acronym for empty tomb, and the dramatic transformation of witnesses

Most scholars agree that the tomb of Jesus was Empty; this includes skeptics, atheists, and Christian scholars. Perhaps more importantly, who discovered the empty tomb? In a section below, I’ll go into additional evidence for this miracle. 

No matter who you are, you must agree that this was a Transformative event in the lives of all who knew Jesus. 


How Do You Explain the Resurrection?

  1. The conspiracy theory
  2. The apparent death theory
  3. The displaced body theory
  4. The hallucination theory





Site Content

Something Happened

Regardless of one’s worldview, nearly all scholars agree that something significant occurred in the early first century. Christianity began, eyewitnesses spread this news worldwide, and men lost their lives, proclaiming they saw the risen Jesus. But is there historical evidence to support our belief in today’s world?


Eyewitness reports help report a historical event. However, some are stronger than others. Below is the acronym to help remember eyewitness accounts of resurrected Jesus.


MEEE or ME X 3


Scholars agree that Paul visited Peter and James (Jesus' half-brother) when he learned the Apostles' creed. The meeting recorded in Galatians 1: 18 occurred within five years of the resurrection. 

M Multiple and individual eyewitnesses. On several occasions, Jesus appeared to groups, including one group of over 500 people. In addition, Jesus met with several people, including the 11 disciples, James, his brother, and the apostle Paul.


E  Embarrassing accounts. People do not make up lies that are embarrassing to them. In that part of the world, and at that time, it was embarrassing that women were the brave ones to discover the empty tomb. If someone were making up a new religion, would they start with women finding the empty tomb? Of course not. Women's testimony in a court of law was nearly useless in the culture of that time.


The guys were crying in their wine. I'm sure a guy could lose his "man card" for a story like this one. 


E Early accounts. Eyewitness accounts are closer to an actual event and more accurate than later accounts. For example, nearly all schol

Enemy attestation Bias is unlikely from a neutral or hostile source. Certainly, the apostle Paul was a hostile source. Before God appeared to Paul, he hated Christians and punished them. Per John 7:5, James, Jesus's half-brother, did not agree with what Jesus said until after the resurrection.



Site Content

Nearly all Biblical Scholars agree on these 5 historical events

  1. Jesus was crucified and died on the cross.
  2. The tomb where Jesus was buried was empty. (
  3. Apostle Paul believed he saw the risen Jesus.
  4. James, the half-brother of Jesus, believed he saw the risen Jesus.
  5. The 11 Apostles believed they saw the risen Jesus.
  6. Over 500 people claimed to see the resurrected Jesus at one time.

Note the illustration on the left.

Copyright © 2025 Reasonable Faith Baltimore - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

Announcement

Welcome! Check out my new announcement.

Learn more