
I was sitting at a desk while working in a large office with two young atheists, talking about all of the problems and struggles in the world that were due to religion. To me, they seemed right because they spoke with confidence and mentioned the Crusades and the witches in Massachusetts. I didn’t say a word because I had heard these kinds of stories for most of my life.
It was time for me to check it out myself. Type in "Hitler was a Christian", and discover over 5 million search results. At the same time, discovering that Stalin, Mao, Hitler, and Pol Pot were deeply religious. Many articles claimed Hitler and the others were very religious, and did so with confidence, boldness, and anger toward a God that to them did not exist.
How do people come up with such unfounded and erroneous beliefs? It is based on ignorance, an inability to understand different writing approaches and cultures, and the use of a variety of logical fallacies.
Almost all the time, they have a blind spot bias, very little knowledge of Christianity, the Bible, or any other religion. With respect to the Bible, unaware of different writing genres, techniques, and styles, including historical, poetic, letters, and wisdom literature. Seemingly unaware of the difference between parables and true stories. Also, unaware of the cultural differences between thousands of years ago and today.
Numerous logical fallacies were used, including cherry picking, contextomy, equivocation, definist, and guilt by association. Although definist is not often used in our world today it is used constantly when smearing Christianity.
. I found such topics were based on guilt by association, cherry picking, contextomy, false information, and lies. Surprisingly, as horrible as the just mentioned people were, they had a mother. Research them and find that most of the mothers at some point in there lives went to some religious activity. That is all some need as proof that psychopathic leader was very religious.
A
The Donovan Nuremberg Trials Collection consists of nearly 150 bound volumes of Nuremberg trial transcripts and documents from the personal archives of General William J. Donovan (1883-1959). The Donovan papers contain both original statements from the defendants in German and typed translations in English prepared by the Allies.
The Donovan Archive is a voluminous collection of material related to the first Nuremberg Trials of 1945-1946 and comprises investigative, procedural, and legal documents. The documents assume various formats, ranging from mimeographs, photostats, and carbon copies to photographs, maps, typescripts, and original manuscripts. While many of the documents are copies that can be found elsewhere, there are a significant number that are unique to Cornell's holdings and that represent an important part of the history of the Nuremberg process.
I have spent many hours reviewing the cornell University online library of the nuremberg trial. There are around 4.000 are available and you may view them as I did (not all 4000. these were collected and stored in a 42-volume set. Unfortunately, they were kept secret.
https://digital.library.cornell.edu/collections/nuremberg
Hitler delivered approximately 1,000 speeches throughout his career, often lasting one and a half to two hours each, resulting in millions of words spoken. While exact, comprehensive word counts for the entirety of his spoken rhetoric are not readily available, about 800 of his speeches have survived in written form. Amazon.com +1
For a full collection of his speeches, the book "My New Order" is a commonly cited, comprehensive source. Amazon.com +1
Why would I choose Hitler to show the mythical relationship between religion and violence? There are several reasons. First, he is so well known, and many people have unwavering beliefs in his honesty and theological knowledge. .Google the phrase "Hitler was a Christian," and you get a return of 56,000.000 sites. Do the same for Billy Graham and get a little less than half of that number.
The poor reasoning or fallacies used to classify Hitler as a Christian are same fallacies used to classify many crazies as Christians. The following fallacies are the most common for associating religion with violence : underlying cause, dunning Kruger, blind spot bigotry, appeal to celebrity, equivocation fallacy, guilt by association, genetic fallacy, and cherry-picking.
Several generations have passed since Hitler died of lead poisoning (a loaded pistol is an excellent administrative device for such a horrible human). Several generations are enough time for myths to crop up, and much information was kept secret until 2017. It seems it was kept confidential to protect the guilty.Today, however, we have over 150 bound volumes of information related to the Nuremberg Trial that was kept secret until 2017. Much of this website is based on that information.

On The View, Whoopi Goldberg in 2015 made a startling claim, suggesting that Christian refugees could be just as dangerous as ISIS. She argued that “there have been a lot of horrifying... a lot of monster Christians. Hitler was a Christian.” When some viewers appeared confused, she clarified her statement, saying, “He didn’t like Catholics, remember? So he thought of himself as a Christian.” This line of reasoning, though shocking, is not uncommon in some online circles. But is this logic sound?
Let’s break down her argument:
Premise 1: Hitler didn’t like Catholics.
Premise 2: Christians didn’t like Catholics.
Conclusion: Therefore, Hitler was a Christian.
While it’s true that Hitler despised Catholics, he also hated a long list of other groups, including Christians (in general), Jehovah’s Witnesses, people with disabilities, Jews, the French, the British, Americans, Polish people, nuns, priests, and atheists. The “atheists” at the time referred to themselves as “free thinkers.”Hitler did not want free thinkers. The claim that Hitler was a Christian, based on his hatred for Catholics alone, is a weak premise.
Premise 2: Ninety percent of Germany was Christian, and out of that, about 30% were Catholic. These groups coexisted peacefully before Hitler’s rise to power. Additionally, Hitler’s own mother was Catholic, and he was never recorded as expressing hatred for her. If both premises were accurate, the argument could be reasonable, but they are not.
Now, let’s look at Joy Behar’s statement: “Timothy McVeigh was a Christian. Just saying.” Behar, like many celebrities, often expresses bold opinions. Her justification for this claim is that McVeigh was baptized and attended church as a boy. However, McVeigh’s religious beliefs as an adult were far from Christian. He never identified with any faith as he grew older and even expressed contempt for organized religion.
The problem with both of these celebrity statements is that they oversimplify complex historical and personal issues. They rely on weak premises and logical fallacies, all while ignoring critical context. In the end, being baptized or having a passing association with a religion doesn’t make one a representative of that faith, and it certainly doesn’t justify making broad, inflammatory claims.
The fallacies in Whoopi’s argument are clear:

The use of the photographic fallacy is a powerful method for influencing people’s beliefs, and often carries implicit biases or connotations that can shape perception. Everyone needs to be cautious about concluding a photograph that provides little context, may be altered, and certainly deceives viewers.
The above photograph is an excellent example of a photographic fallacy used by Hitler to manipulate the beliefs of the German people and hide Hitler’s actual beliefs.
The picture above, taken in 1932, was a crucial year in the rise of Nazi power. Hitler had not yet consolidated full control, and members of the

July 20, 1933
When examining photographs from early Nazi Germany, one might see images that suggest unity—church leaders standing beside government officials or smiling youth gathered under national banners. These images create the illusion of harmony and shared purpose. In reality, they reflect a calculated strategy by the Nazi regime to control two of the most powerful forces in society: religion and youth. Through the 1933 Concordat with the Vatican and the Nazi government worked systematically to eliminate independent influence over both the Church and young people, ensuring ideological loyalty to Adolf Hitler above all else.
In 1933, Nazi Germany signed the Reichskonkordat with the Holy See under Pope Pius XI. On paper, the agreement guaranteed that the Catholic Church could continue to operate freely within Germany. In return, however, the Church agreed to withdraw from political involvement and refrain from interfering with the Nazi government. While the Concordat appeared to be a mutual agreement, it effectively silenced one of the few institutions capable of challenging Hitler’s authority.
At the same time, the regime sought to reshape Christianity itself. Under Reich Bishop Ludwig Müller, efforts were made to align Protestant churches with Nazi racial ideology. Some supporters of the “German Christian” movement attempted to remove the Old Testament and eliminate Jewish references from the New Testament—essentially stripping Christianity of its Jewish roots. This was not simply religious reform; it gutted Christianity of Christianity.
Although Christians were technically allowed to worship, their freedom was conditional. Religious organizations, including youth groups, were permitted to exist only as long as they avoided political involvement. Over time, even these limited protections weakened as the Nazi regime consolidated its power. Like many of Hitler’s agreements, the Concordat proved unreliable in practice.
If the Concordat helped neutralize religious opposition, control of the youth ensured the regime's future. As leader of the Hitler Youth, Baldur von Schirach was tasked with shaping the beliefs of Germany’s younger generation. Official documents later presented at the Nuremberg Trials described his duty as “to imbue the members with Nazi ideology and prepare them for membership in the Party and its formations.” His role was not merely administrative—it was ideological.
Before 1934, Christian youth organizations were shut down (d, (1) and membership in the Hitler Youth became mandatory. In 1937 Schirach announced "the struggle for unification of the German youth is finished. I considered it as my duty to conducted in a hard and uncompromising manner. Many might not have realized why we went through so much trouble for the sake of the youth. And yet the national Socialist German workers party, whose trustee I felt I always was, and always will be, this party considered the struggle for the youth as the decisive element for the future of the German nation." This eliminated alternative moral and spiritual influences on children and replaced them with state-directed indoctrination. Boys were trained for military service, while girls were prepared for roles that supported the regime’s racial policies. Loyalty to Hitler was presented as the highest virtue.
Nazi propaganda reinforced this transformation. Posters depicted strong, unified young people devoted to the nation and even challenged other countries with slogans such as, “What do you say, America?” These images promoted national pride while implying that Germany’s youth were more disciplined and united than those elsewhere. Behind the imagery, however, was a system designed to suppress independent thought and promote unquestioning obedience.
The Concordat and the restructuring of youth organizations were not separate policies; they were interconnected parts of a broader strategy. By limiting the political influence of the Church and eliminating independent youth groups, the Nazi regime removed competing sources of authority. Religion and childhood—two areas traditionally guided by family and faith—were brought under state control.
In conclusion, what appeared to be cooperation between church and state, or unity among German youth, was in fact a deliberate consolidation of power. Through agreements that weakened religious independence and programs that indoctrinated the young, the Nazi regime secured ideological dominance. The photographs may suggest harmony, but history reveals a calculated effort to reshape both faith and future generations in service of totalitarian control..
1: https://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur00536#page/3/mode/1up

Same photograph, except six years later, when Hitler had the ultimate power. Between 1935 and 1938, Hoffman altered the picture to better portray Hitler’s beliefs.
Ludwig was replaced by Baldur von Schirach. This occurred within months after Hitler’s agreement to permit Christian youth groups.

After Ludwig Muellur was fired and Baldur Von Schirach took over. It ended the concordat agreement.
If the Concordat helped neutralize religious opposition, control of the youth ensured the future of the regime. As leader of the Hitler Youth, Baldur von Schirach was tasked with shaping the beliefs of Germany’s younger generation. Official documents later presented at the Nuremberg Trials described his duty as “to imbue the members with Nazi ideology and prepare them for membership in the Party and its formations.” His role was not merely administrative—it was ideological.
Shortly after Schirach took control, Christian youth organizations were shut down, and membership in the Hitler Youth became mandatory. This eliminated alternative moral and spiritual influences on children and replaced them with state-directed indoctrination. Boys were trained for military service, while girls were prepared for roles that supported the regime’s racial policies. Loyalty to Hitler was presented as the highest virtue.
Nazi propaganda reinforced this transformation. Posters depicted strong, unified young people devoted to the nation and even challenged other countries with slogans such as, “What do you say, America?” These images promoted national pride while implying that Germany’s youth were more disciplined and united than those elsewhere. Behind the imagery, however, was a system designed to suppress independent thought and promote unquestioning obedience.
The Concordat and the restructuring of youth organizations were not separate policies; they were interconnected parts of a broader strategy. By limiting the political influence of the Church and eliminating independent youth groups, the Nazi regime removed competing sources of authority. Religion and childhood—two areas traditionally guided by family and faith—were brought under state control.
In conclusion, what appeared to be cooperation between church and state, or unity among German youth, was in fact a deliberate consolidation of power. Through agreements that weakened religious independence and programs that indoctrinated the young, the Nazi regime secured ideological dominance. The photographs may suggest harmony, but history reveals a calculated effort to reshape both faith and future generations in service of totalitarian control..

Hitler's painting of Jesus and Mary
uring the rise of National Socialism in Germany, Adolf Hitler and Nazi theologians promoted an image of Jesus that reflected Aryan racial ideals—blond-haired, blue-eyed, and detached from Jewish identity. While some accepted this portrayal at the time, and a few continue to believe it today, this reconstructed figure bears little resemblance to the Jesus described in the Christian Scriptures. The effort to present Jesus as a Gentile rather than a Jew required significant theological revision and historical distortion. In reshaping Jesus to fit Nazi ideology, essential elements of the Christian faith were systematically removed.
The New Testament consistently situates Jesus within a Jewish historical and religious context. According to the Gospels, his family traveled to Bethlehem in response to a Roman census. He was born in humble conditions and later taken to Egypt to escape King Herod’s persecution before returning to live among the Jewish people. The Gospel accounts trace his lineage to Jewish ancestors and portray him participating in Jewish customs, teaching in synagogues, and referencing Hebrew Scripture. From birth to ministry, Jesus is presented as deeply rooted in Jewish tradition. To detach him from that heritage is to disregard the narrative framework of the New Testament itself.

Alfred looks a little scared. True, he was afraid of a cervical dislocation, but he always knew he would end up as worm chow.
This is Alfred Rosenberg, a long-time associate of Hitler and a member of the National Socialists party prior to Hitler. He wrote the book "The Myth of the 20th Century" which is soaked in hate of Christianity. Ten years later he shared his beliefs of a new German Nationalist Church which was leaked to President Roosevelt of the United States. Roosevelt read it to United States-big mistake for the Nazis. People no longer believed Hitler was a Christian.
https://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur00773#mode/1up
Point 1: “The National Reich Church of Germany categorically claims the exclusive right and the exclusive power to control all the churches within the borders of the Reich; it declares these to be national churches of the German Reich”.
Point 2: “The German people must not serve the National Church. The National Church is absolutely and exclusively in the service of but one doctrine: race and nation”.
Point 3: “The field of activity of the National Church will expand to the limits of Germany’s territorial and colonial possessions”.
Point 4: “The National Church does not force any German to seek membership therein. The National Church will do everything within its power to secure the adherence of every German soul. Other churches or similar communities and unions particularly such as are under international control or management cannot and shall not be tolerated in Germany”.
Point 5: “The National Church is determined to exterminate irrevocably and by every means the strange and foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800”.
Point 6: “The existing churches may not be architecturally altered, as they represent the property of the German nation, German culture, and to a certain extent the historical development of the nation. As property of the German nation they are not only to be valued but to be preserved”.
Point 7: “The National Church has no scribes, pastors, chaplains, or priests, but National Reich orators are to speak in them”.
Point 8: “The National Church services are held only in the evening and not in the morning. These services are to take place on Saturdays with solemn illumination” .
Point 9: “In the National Church German men and women, German youths and girls will acknowledge God and His eternal works”.
Point 10: “The National Church irrevocably strives for complete union with the state. It must obey the state as one of its servants. As such it demands that all landed possessions of all churches and religious denominations be handed over to the state. It forbids that the future churches should secure ownership of even the smallest piece of German soil or that such be ever given back to them. Not the churches conquer and cultivate land and soil but exclusively the German nation, the German state”.
Point 11: “National Church orators may never be those who today emphasize with all tricks and cunning, verbally and in writing, the necessity of maintaining and teaching Christianity in Germany. They not only lie to themselves but also to the German nation, goaded by their love of the positions they hold and the sweet bread they eat.”
Point 12: “National Church orators hold office as government officials under civil service rules”.
Point 13: “The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible in Germany as well the publication of Sunday papers, pamphlets, publications, and books of religious nature”. Point 14: “The National Church declares that to it, and therefore to the German nation, it has been decided that Fuehrer’s Mein Kampf is the greatest of all documents. It is conscious that this book not only contains the greatest, but that it embodies the purest and truest ethics for the present and future life of our nation”.
Point 15: “The National Church has to take severe measures in order to prevent the Bible and other Christian publications being imported into Germany”. Point 16: “The National Church has made it its sacred duty to use all its energy to popularize the coeternal Mein Kampf and to let every German live and complete his life according to this book”.
Point 17: “The National Church demands that further editions of this book, whatever form they may take, be in content and pagination exactly similar to the present popular edition”.
Point 18: “The National Church will clear away from its altars all crucifixes, Bibles, and pictures of Saints”.
Point 19: “On the altars there must be nothing but Mein Kampf (to the German nation and therefore to God the most sacred book) and to the left of the altar a sword”.
Point 20: “The National Church speakers must during the National Church services propound this book to the congregation to the best of their knowledge and ability”.
Point 21: “The National Church does not acknowledge forgiveness of sins. It represents the standpoint which it will always proclaim that a sin once committed will be ruthlessly punished by the honorable and indestructible laws of nature and punishment will follow during the sinner’s lifetime”.
Point 22: “The National Church repudiates the christening of German children particularly the christening of water and the Holy Ghost”.
Point 23: “The parents of a child must take only the German oath before the altar. This oath is worded as follows: The man: “In the name of God I take this Holy oath that I (name), the father of this child, and my wife, are of proven Aryan descent. As a father I agree to bring up this child in the German spirit and as a member of the German race.” The woman: “In the name of God I take this Holy oath that I (name) bore my husband a child and that my husband is the father of this child and that I its mother am of proven Aryan descent. As a mother I swear to bring up this child in the German spirit and as a member of the German race.” The German diploma can be issued only to newly born children on the strength of the German oath”.
Point 24: “The National Church abolishes confirmation and religious education as well as the communion, the religious preparation for the communion. The educational institutions are and remain the family, the schools, the Hitler Youth, and the Union of German Girls”.
Point 25: “In order that school graduation of our German youth be given an especially solemn character, all National Churches must put themselves at the disposal of German youth. The Hitler Youth day will be on the Friday before Easter. On this day only the leaders of these organizations may speak”.
Point 26: “The marriage ceremony of German men and women will consist of taking an oath of faithfulness and placing the right hand on the sword. There will not be any unworthy kneeling in National Church ceremonies”.
Point 27: “The National Church declares the tenth day before Whitsunday to be the national holiday of the German family”.
Point 28: “The National Church rejects the customary day of prayer and atonement. It demands that this be transferred to the holiday commemorating the laying of the foundation stone of the National Church”.
Point 29: “The National Church will not tolerate the establishment of any new clerical religious insignia”.
Point 30: “On the day of its foundation the Christian cross must be removed from all churches, cathedrals, and chapels within the Reich and its colonies, and it must be superseded by the only unconquerable symbol of the Hakenkreuz (swastika)”.
Here is a structured outline of R&A No. 3114.4 – The Persecution of Christian Churches under the Third Reich (Research & Analysis Report, U.S. War Department, 1945), which documents Nazi policy toward Catholic and Protestant churches.
The report concludes that:
If you would like, I can also:
YES
Below is a structured year-by-year breakdown (1933–1945) drawn from R&A No. 3114.4 – The Persecution of the Christian Churches (OSS Research & Analysis Branch, 1945), based on captured Nazi documentation.
Produced by the Office of Strategic Services.
Pattern: Public assurances; private preparation for control.
Shift: From coordination to coercion.
Goal: Gradual removal of Church influence from youth and education.
OSS conclusion: Trials often politically motivated to discredit clergy.
Turning Point: Open ideological conflict visible.
Trend: Regime emboldened by foreign policy successes.
Strategic pause, not reconciliation.
Evidence in R&A report: Internal planning for eventual reduction of Christianity’s influence.
(Figures reflect concentration camp and documented arrests; total investigations much higher.)
✔ Control
✔ Neutralization
✔ Removal of political influence
OSS analysts conclude conflict was ideological and structural, not merely political.
If you’d like next, I can provide:
Faith can provide strength and comfort during difficult times. It can help people find hope and meaning in their struggles, and give them the courage to keep moving forward.
Whoopi's whopper is based on a logical fallacy: underlying cause. Establishing her belief on one cause is a bit absurd. The logic is stated below:
The poor logic in concluding that Hitler was a Christian is a logical fallacy. Whoopi's whopper logic is
Premise 1: Christians do not like Catholics
Premise 2: Hitler did not like Catholics
Conclusion: Hitler was a Christian.
It makes as much sense as
Premise 1: Old TV sets are black and white
Premise 2: Penguins are black and white
Conclusion: Penguins are old TV sets
The premises of the above arguments do not infer the conclusion. I'm sure there are some Christians who do not like Catholics, but the first premise in the Whopper is not sound.
Joy Behr just proclaims something with no reason.
“National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable.”
The OSS report cites internal Party records and table conversations attributed to Adolf Hitler showing repeated assertions that Christianity weakened racial vitality and promoted “Jewish” moral concepts.
“The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.”
R&A analysts interpret such statements (from captured conversations) as evidence that the regime’s restraint was tactical rather than principled.
From internal Nazi memoranda cited in R&A 3114.4:
“The churches must not again regain an influence over the leadership of the people.”
The report emphasizes that internal policy papers describe a gradual process, avoiding open conflict during wartime.
“Political Catholicism must disappear from the life of the German people.”
This phrase appears in Party correspondence and Ministry of Church Affairs documentation.
Created in 1935, the Ministry coordinated anti-church policy.
“The National Socialist state will tolerate no rival.”
OSS analysts argue this statement reveals that persecution was tied to the totalitarian nature of the regime rather than isolated disputes.
Documents concerning suppression of the Confessing Church (which included pastors like Martin Niemöller):
“The Confessional movement represents a danger to the unity of the Reich.”
Arrest records and Gestapo reports cited in the OSS file support systematic targeting.
At Dachau Concentration Camp, special barracks housed clergy.
“Clergymen who persist in political activity are to be transferred to a concentration camp.”
The report documents thousands of Catholic priests and hundreds of Protestant pastors detained.
Captured Party circulars discussed post-war intentions:
“After the war the solution of the church question will be taken up in its entirety.”
OSS analysts interpret this as strong evidence that wartime moderation was temporary.
The report concludes (paraphrasing its analytical judgment):
The documentary trail shows that anti-church measures were state policy, not local excess.
If you would like next, I can:
Dunning Kruger is a cognitive bias. Simply put, it is when people know so little about a topic that they are unaware of their ignorance. This is common with religion; many people know so little about Christianity they criticize religion but are clueless. Thank you, Whoopi, for your excellent example; you are not alone.
I believe everyone has bias, but few, if anyone, sees their own bias. Whoopi and Joy do not see theirs. What is worse, the audacious audience applauds the homicidal Hitler. Sad.
Perhaps I'm too hard on Whoopi. After all, she is on TV. But, unfortunately, being famous affects some peoples' judgment of the validity of what they say. The audience, without thinking on their own, must acceptindependentlycelebrity's the celebrities statements.
Both Whoopi and Joy exude confidence when talking. If that confident, is it possible for them to be wrong?

Underlying cause fallacy:
Wow, Whoopi: "He didn't like Catholics " Of course, Whoopi is correct, but that is hardly the underlying cause of his hatred. dislikeThe book on Hitler's personality states his likes and dislikes. This analysis was a part of OSS records (Office of Strategic Services, a precursor to the FI). It is based on Mein Kamph and various people who had significant interactions with Hitler. Per Murray:" Most of Hitler's sentiments are well known and have already been listed: "his high valuation of power, glory, dictatorship, nationalism, militarism, and brutality; and his low valuation of weakness, indecision, tolerance, compassion, peace, rational debate, democracy, bolshevism, materialism, capitalism, the Jewish race, Christianity." http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur01134#page/29/mode/1up (21-22) Murray
I'm sure some atheists dislike Catholics, but it is laughable to think they would kill anyone. Hitler was a cesspool of underlying causes.
Was Hitler an emotionally even even-keeled person? From the book "Analysis of The Personality of Adolf Hitler," Not really; he had problems other than his dislike of Catholics.
Per Murray, he had "emotional outbursts, tantrums of rage and accusatory indignation ending in tears in self-pity; succeeded by periods of inertia, exhaustion, melancholy, and indecisiveness (accompanied sometimes by hours of acute dejection and disquieting nightmares) leading to recuperation; and finally, confident and resolute decision to counter-attack with great force and ruthlessness. The entire cycle may run its course in 24 hours, or it may be weeks before the aggressive decision of the third stage is reached."
http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur:01134#page/22/mode/1up (15)
I must agree he was a little bit moody.
But that's not all. "Hitler is a victim of temper tantrums which have increased in intensity and frequency during the last 10 years. Atypical seizure consists of one pacing, shouting, cursing, blaming, accusations of treachery and betrayal; to weeping an exhibition of self-pity; and then falling on the floor, foaming at the mouth, and biting the carpet. The man has some control over these epileptic form attacks, using them to get his own way with his close associates."(88) Biting the carpet? Perhaps his diet was low in fiber.
Murray describes hysterical dissociation:dissociation: " He experience periods of , violent emotional outbursts, visions of hallucinatory clarity."
http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur:01134#page/32/mode/1up (25) Too much coffee?
In his Hitler analysis, Murray brings up Marquis de Sade; I don't believe this is fair to de Sade. De Sade usually connected violence with sex, and Hitler took pleasure and relief from more disgusting violence and torture. Murray gives examples."Although the will to power is the central principle, fused with it is a vindictiveness which takes pleasure in the painful humiliation of his adversaries." Also, "The purge of 1934, the anti-somatic atrocities, the unspeakable crimes committed in Poland, these in many other actions executed or ordered by Hitler demonstrate the extent of his sadism and revengefulness.
http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur01134#page/2/mode/1up page 176-77
Add to these sadistic characteristics, both hysterical dissociation and all the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia it is safe to say he had some mental health issues as some of his underlying issues.
This type of pleasure was common amongst the Nazis, and they didn't learn this from the "Sermon on the Mount."

He had a way with the ladies. But when he heated things between the sheets, they took the honorable way out: suicide. It's easy to blame guns, but it was quick and gave immediate relief from methane toxicity.
One of the three closest girls in his life survived ten years after the attempt.
I'm not making this up; well, I'm making up the "don't come back and see me in the morning. In all seriousness, the strychnine in those pills might not have killed him, but they didn't help.

"like naïve Christians and their spiritual opportunists, a human type being, who sits around somewhere in the sphere.... " Marty that's just mean.
Overbearing, Bormann was the number two Nazi in Germany. Information went from Adolf and through Marty to the government. The letter below went to 42 gauleiters (similar to governors in the United States). Lord, God, and Almighty meant one thing to Christians but something different to Hateful Hitler and the Nazis. Below is a letter written on June 7, 1941.
"When we National Socialists speak of a belief in God, we do not understand by GodGod, like naïve Christians and their spiritual opportunists, a human type being, who sits around somewhere in the sphere...
"The force of natural law, with which all these innumerable planets move in the universe we call the Almighty or God. The claim that this world force ...can be influenced by so-called prayers or other astonishing things is based upon a proper dose of naivete or on a business shamelessness.
"As opposed to that, we National Socialists impose on ourselves and demand to live naturally as much as possible, i.e., biologically. The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and of life, the more we adhere to them, so much the more do we conform to the will. of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of the Almighty, the greater will be our successes."
http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur00771#mode/1up
Maybe misleading Marty got up on the wrong side of the bed. The terms God, Lord, and the Almighty can be ambiguous. Their beliefs were similar to pantheism (the universe is God).
About the "live as much as possible, i.e., biologically," were you thinking this when you took cyanide, or were you conforming "to the will of the Almighty." How nice of the Russians to acclimate you to your future abode.

Hitler painted a blond-haired, blue-eyed Jesus, and some people then and now believe it. But the baby in the painting is not Jesus of the Christian faith, and the mother was per Hitler, a Greek woman with a Roman soldier husband. Call the baby what you want, but a gentile Jesus is n not the Jesus of the Christian faith. It is absurd.ts like trying to put a square peg in a round hole; it is awkward and does not make sense.
This list could go on and on, but the Blonde-haired, blu-eyed Jesus is not the Christian Jesus.
To make this blue-eye, blond-haired Jesus, the Nazis made a few changes to the Christian Bible.
As crazy as this is, there were groups of people during Hitler's time who accepted the gentile Jesus, and people today have similar beliefs. These people believe they have an idea of Christianity but are an example of the Dunning-Kruger fallacy.

Hitler needed support from a country that was 90% Christian. In the earlier part of his career, Hitler's solution was to pretend he was Christian until he gained total power. In 1935 he used the picture to prove his Christianity. Although not a fallacy, pictures have more of an effect on people than writing, which was the reason for the image. The picture on the left was in Heinrich Hoffman's collection in 1935 but doctored for the 1938 edition.
Hitler's Religion.The Twisted Beliefs That Drove the Third Reich page 68-69
In a speech in 1922, while running for a government position, he said: "My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man, who, once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! Was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man, I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison? Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian, I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man, I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some two thousand years ago—a civilization that was driven to its ruin through this same Jewish people." Let's look at this story.

This image is from a German school book in Nazi Germany. The blond-haired woman is telling how the Jews killed Jesus. As mentioned earlier is absurd. Yet, today in the United States, churches that believe Jesus was a Gentile still exist. Even the Southern Poverty Law Center reports these churches as Christian in name only.
There are well over 200,000 churches in the united states and nine groups of Christian Identity Movement groups. This does not matter to some people; they respect Hitler's honesty and refuse to believe in a Jewish Jesus. After all, has there ever been a better theologian?
Well over 99% of terrorism blamed on Christians in the United States is associated with the Gentile Jesus
What is positive Christianity? It ain't positive, and it ain't Christian. Its primary tenants are:
It doesn't sound positive to me, and the belief that Jesus was bizarre. Think about it
Hitler and the Nazis initially encouraged this church, which believed in the Gentile Jesus. They hoped to combine Gentile Jesus Churches and Jewish Jesus Churches. The Nazis were allowed to attend the Reich Church, but not the other. The blogosphere is filled with photos in the Reich Church and were used as a propaganda. At the time it was helpful to the Nazis and today many people are unaware of the difference.

Look, they are BFFs. Of course, they are! I wouldn't call Hitler and Reich Bishop Ludwig Mueller friends, but they did know each other, and Hitler did not kill him. Lud was a Gentile Jesus believer, a leader in the Reich Church, and was rewriting the Bible to fit his beliefs.
The smiling Ludwig Muller actually won his position as Reich Bishop by-election ( actually, he came in second). . Friedrich von Bodelschwingh won the election but resigned for some reason. Hitler was the "reason," and Ludwig, who believed in a blue-eyed, blond-haired Jesus, was not surprisingly appointed. This was on July 20, 1933.
Within a couple of months, the destruction of the churches began. You can read the entire 92-page document prepared for the Nuremberg trials or read my quick summary at the end of this page.
Cherry-picking is a flaw in reasoning. An example is looking at a cherry tree with lots of cherries ready for picking, picking one rotten cherry, and reporting all the cherries on the tree are rotten. The person ignores all the good cherries and focuses on one cherry.
Hitler did this with the Bible, and today many on the blogosphere pick out a couple of sentences from his speeches and ignore the rest. Note the 1922 speech when Hitler was a young politician in a country that was 90% Christian. Hitler chose one story about Jesus chasing commercial activity out of the Temple and then lies and disregarded most of the Bible. Today, those who love and respect Hitler as a theologian, and a man who would never lie, disregard 99% of Hitler's speeches.
In a speech in 1922, while running for a government position, he said: "My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man, who, once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man, I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison? Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion, I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian, I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man, I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some two thousand years ago—a civilization that was driven to its ruin through this same Jewish people." Let's look at this story.
Clearly Hitler only accepts a Gentile Jesus and speaks and his made-up Jesus was fighter. Other than turning over some tables there was no fighting. Jesus didn't even defend himself verbally in court much less physically. Clearly Dunning Kruger fallacy was prevalent in Hitler's Germany and just as prevalent in our world today.
If customers can’t find it, it doesn’t exist. Clearly list and describe the services you offer. Also, be sure to showcase a premium service.
One of the most famous photographs of Hitler and is used as proof that Hitler was a Christian and the Christian Church was in cahoots with the Nazis to spread hate and violence. This faulty logic is called guilt by association. The photograph was used to fool people, it did so, and more today than ever before. The supposed protestant minister's (he believed in the blue-eyed blond-haired Jesus) primary purpose was to mix the churches with National Socialism. It did not work.
The photograph was taken in 1933 to celebrate Hitler's increased power. Mueller, the man, shaking hands with Hitler, was handpicked by Hitler. His beliefs were identical to Hitler's, and his job was to convert Germans into one new religion, which was a mixture of Hitler's religious beliefs and German Nationalism. That is why many photographs and pictures with Christian symbols and National Socialists Symbols mistakenly give the impression the two were working together. They were not. Below is a quick summary of Hitler's actions after the photograph.
Since 2017, the world has had access to thousands of pages of information collected by the Office of Strategic Services (O.S.S.), the precursor to the C.I.A., used against the Nazis during Nuremberg. https://lawcollections.library.cornell.edu/nuremberg/catalog/nur:00773 "S.R. &3114.4/
The Nazi Master Plan/ Annex 4: The Persecution of the Christian Churches / Office of Strategic Services / Research and Analysis Branch / Draft for the War Crimes Staff/ Approved by the Prosecution Review Board / CONFIDENTIAL." it is just over 90 pages. Although just a summary of the Nazi's actual beliefs. Below is a quick summary of the 90-page document. The numbers at the end of the reference are the page number in the document.
The brave Nazis released the seven Catholic girls who distributed church materials; weren't they kind?http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur:01562#page/16/mode/1up
http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=nur:00541#page/61/mode/1up

